![]() ![]() Addressing them is very simple once you understand what your site is demanding. Seeing all these alerts in the browser developer console can be scary, but don't worry. This behavior is helpful for development environments where the platform's security is not essential, but the developer needs to be aware of any violations to address them adequately. Using "report only," makes the browser no longer enforce the directives but continue to display the corresponding violation alerts. Let's see what a Content Security Policy header would look like: This security layer helps mitigate attacks that take advantage of vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting (XSS) and injection attacks by providing an allowlist of trusted resources. To ensure security, the server provides a CSP through the response header to guarantee that the browser executes only valid resources. The browsers then have to process and execute these resources without any malicious code or access data not belonging to the website in question. The referenced code could be from the same origin (requested domain) or another origin browsers don't distinguish. This process is standard and usually harmless as pretty much all modern websites are complex in nature and comprised of lots of lines of HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and other resources like images and files that the code references. While loading a page, the browser has to request and render content and code-a lot of it. ![]() join ( " app/javascript ", item )).Content Security Policy is a collection of policies or directions that your browser enforces on webpages when requested. readdirSync ( " app/javascript " ) const directories = items. To reference our own Javascript modules, with used plain path without or ~/ at the beginning. The various problems that occurred afterwards were solved as followed below: Fix import aliases ![]() Then, I removed all of webpack, webpacker and babel: babelrc, package.json, Gemfile, config/webpack*, bin/webpack*. Then I replaced all javascript_pack_tag with vite_javascript_tag and removed the stylesheet_pack_tag (Vite only needs the entrypoint javascript, and then it will include all dependencies and generated stylesheets). I throw them away and started with a fresh vite-config generated by vite-ruby. MigrationĪt the beginning, I’ve tried 2 automatic migration tool, that did almost nothing. For this particular project, that is not necessary, but in the future other projects, that generate styled PDFs must be migrated to puppeteer or similar ( See the discussion on Github). The biggest drawback against Vite would be, that we could not use wkhtmltopdf with styled documents anymore. Vite can be configured via + and still support HMR live updates via websockets, which was not the case for some other bundlers. In our case, we mostly work on a central server, so everybody got a couple of ports assigned to map to frontend https. Vite (as does Webpack) supports configuration options for using a public development proxy that is handled by a Reverse Proxy. Git diff -shortstat origin/master - yarn.lockġ file changed, 1358 insertions(+), 7642 deletions(-) For our migration, the is much smaller than the whole of Webpack config: Vite is a more opinionated approach and works OOTB without many plugins - We only use Vue plugin, the rest, like Sass, Typescript, even Pug, just work if you have the related packages installed). Especially the initial start took like 1-2 minute with Webpack and after a while the server took several (~1-4) gigabyte of RAM (multiplied by Number of Projects Times Number of Developers can grow to unhealthy limits) and needed regular restarts.Ĭonfiguration fatigue: Starting with Webpack 2, and going up to 4, migrating between the Rails wrapper Webpacker 3 - 5, it found it is a major PITA to manage all the details, such as Babel-config, loaders, plugins and many other configuration snippets. Why move?Ĭompared to Webpack, it’s much faster, as it does less and relies more on the Module loading (and thus, delayed Runtime errors) in the browser. That’s why, after evaluating a couple of other options, we are going to Vite. But in our case, having a separate build server that enables productivity enhancing features such as Hot Module Reload, or playing around with SSR, is a much more useful alternative for us. Rails in general likes to move to more simpler Import-Maps by default, or using esbuild directly. But since a couple of months, there are other alternatives to consider.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |